Hit enter to search or ESC to close
The question “Who is a hunter education supporter?” often arises at meetings for hunting clubs, and it’s hard to know where to turn to get the real answers. Those who have spent many years hunting probably know the answer already. It’s the hunters themselves who fund and support hunter education.
To find out who is a primary supporter of hunter education programs, contact your local wildlife service agency and ask them. It’s likely that they will have the names of conservation organizations or individual states who are behind these programs. There are also private groups who support the conservation of wildlife. Check with any one of these groups to find out which group is a primary supporter of hunter education programs in your state.
Who is a primary supporter of hunter education programs? It’s pretty obvious. It’s the individual hunters who pay for their own hunting licenses! And what about the various state and federal aid programs?
A good example of which group is a primary supporter of hunter education is the National Wildlife Federation. They provide a variety of assistance to state wildlife agencies in providing hunter education programs. Among those programs is the Foothills Partnerships, which provides federal aid to state wildlife agencies to support a variety of hunting-related projects, including hunter education. In the past, these same funds have been channeled to individual states to provide hunter education in education programs, including guided hunting trips.
How do they get this money? The National Wildlife Federation gets its funds from hunting license fees paid by both private individuals and resort managers. Likewise, the private individual who pays the fee to reserve his or her own hunting license often gets an additional amount, called a benefit, for paying the fee. The advantage to the resort manager or the property owner is that these fees are usually recurring. And when these fees are used to support hunter education programs, the money comes directly from the federal government, rather than from limited tax sources.
But how does this money get to wildlife conservation and educational projects? These funds can be channeled through two main means. Many states provide these funds directly to the relevant state wildlife agency, while others use contributions from private citizens or corporate entities. In either case, the money that comes from these tax sources supports a variety of hunter education programs, including habitat improvement for species, public safety, and other programs.
But why should we focus on the relationship between which group is a primary supporter of hunter education programs, and the types of hunter education programs that are supported? After all, the relationship between any two groups doesn’t always translate perfectly to support for one another’s activities. For example, when you are looking at the financial support for public safety, you shouldn’t necessarily assume that there is a correlation between hunting-related tax dollars and public safety. Similarly, when you are analyzing the relationship between hunting licenses and the numbers of fish taken in a given year, you shouldn’t necessarily assume that hunting-related license fees are the primary objective behind the numbers of hunters harvested that particular year.
In many ways, then, the question should be asked: which group is a primary supporter of hunter education? In most cases, the answer should be a state government. Each state has a responsibility to those who utilize the state’s natural resources, especially as their habitats are destroyed by the destructive actions of human beings. The preservation of North American wildlife depends on the cooperation and support from state and local governments, as well as the general public.
About the author