Hit enter to search or ESC to close
Health education become a more and more concerned issues of many people. So, what are the three levels of evaluation commonly used in health education program planning? This followed article will show you the answer!
=> health education specialists who work with groups of volunteers should remember that
=> what does education means to you?
In a health education program, students learn the basics of how to take care of their body and keep it healthy. However, it is also important to understand that health is not a simple problem to treat as it involves more than just the physical aspect. A health education course focuses on the psychological and emotional well-being of a person as it influences his or her physical health. The three levels of evaluation used in health education planning are:
The first level of evaluation, which covers all the basic concepts, such as assessment, diagnosis, assessment formulating methods, and assessment procedures, is covered in the first part of the health education plan. Mental health refers to mental, emotional, social, and environmental factors that affect the health of an individual. here are many different types of mental disorders, and they include but are not limited to schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, depression, anxiety, and psychosis. Psychological assessment includes the ability to detect patterns of behavior, intelligence, personality, and intelligence, in addition to behavior related to emotions, cognition, memory, and learning. The second level of evaluation is the evaluation of a health education plan’s impact on health, including its impact on an individual’s physical, mental, and social well-being.
The second level of evaluation determines the effectiveness of a health education plan in effecting changes to health. It also evaluates the effects that would occur if changes in health were not made. This level is known as the situational analysis. In this stage, the health education provider reviews the environment, its components, and the reactions of the different people in the environment. This can include the reactions of employers, patients, other health education professionals, and the community. This is an important part of the process of developing a health education plan and is considered to be an indicator of the plan’s effectiveness.
The third level of evaluation determines the impact that the health education program has on health. This is called the comparative analysis. Comparative analysis compares the expected results of the health education program with the actual results in real settings. For example, the analysis would compare the health of a group of young adults with that of a group of older adults who were not enrolled in a health education program.
The fourth and final level of evaluation measures the impact that what three levels of evaluation used in health education has had on the lives of those it has helped. In this evaluation, the health education provider makes observations about the experiences of the people it has helped. It might make observations about the changes in symptoms or the frequency of symptoms, or it might even make observations about the experiences of the people as a result of their participation in the health education program. But it will almost certainly make observations about how the people fit into the health care system as a whole, how they feel about their health and the quality of the care they receive, and how those feelings change once they are enrolled in the health education program. These observations will almost certainly reveal whether the health education program was effective in bringing about improvements in the lives of those it has helped.
What about what three levels of evaluation used in health education plan? Are they useful in any way? No. They are a good reference to use for research purposes, but they do not tell you whether what the researchers observed was actually the case in real life. If, for example, health education researchers observe that a health education program brings about an increase in the number of people who go to the doctor on a regular basis, but they do not note whether this increase occurs among people who already receive regular medical care or among people who would not have gone to the doctor if they had not been enrolled in the health education program.
What do those references tell us? They tell us that what the researchers observed is likely to be true-unless the health education program is found to be ineffective or harmful. They might also tell us that what the health education researchers observed is highly unlikely to be true, and that therefore we should take no action with regard to that health education program. But they cannot tell us which things are likely to be true, and which things are likely to be false.
There is a possibility, though, that what the health education researchers observed may turn out to be true. That possibility exists because observation of health education plans can lead to new ideas and to new insights about what the health education program is doing, and what it could do. And what do I mean by that? Well, suppose that researchers observe that after six months of having health education programs, participants are having fewer health problems; and suppose that they observe that the frequency of problems that were observed to have been reduced during the six months of the program was consistent with what might have been expected from the health education program. That would mean that what the health education researchers took as their observations about what three levels of evaluation used in health education-what level of evaluation was used on the content of the health education program-was probably correct.
This article is provided by Honduras Educacional. Thank you for reading
About the author